Rosenfeld, Yards. J. (2010, April). Appointment on the web: An upswing of your own Internet sites due to the fact a personal intermediary. Presentation from the Society Relationship away from America Conferences, Dallas, Texas. [ Backlinks ]
Shtatfeld, Roentgen., & Barak, An excellent. (2009). Things regarding introducing social connections towards the Dating sites: A perspective on personal change idea. Interpersona: An international Journal towards Individual Relationship, step 3, 19-37. [ Backlinks ]
Skopek, J., Schulz, F., & Blossfeld, H-P. (2010). Whom connections who? Educational homophily in the online lover choice. European Sociological Opinion. [ Hyperlinks ]
Sprecher, S. (1998a). Insiders’ point of views to the things about destination so you’re able to a close other. Personal Therapy Quarterly, 61, 287-3 hundred. [ Website links ]
Sprecher, S. (1998b). What enjoys hitched lovers keen on one another? 100 % free Inquiry within the Creative Sociology, twenty-six, 193-200. [ Links ]
Sprecher, S., & Duck, S. (1994). Sweet talk: The importance of perceived interaction for intimate and you may friendship appeal sense throughout a get-acquainted day. Identity and you can Public Mindset Bulletin, 20, 391400. [ Website links ]
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1992). This new determine out-of moms and dads and you may family unit members to the quality and you may balance out of romantic dating: A three-trend longitudinal investigation. Diary away from ily, 54, 888-900. [ Hyperlinks ]
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (2000). Close partners’ attitudes off social network attributes toward passage through of some time and relationship changes. [ Links ]
Sprecher, S., Felmlee, D., Orbuch, T. L., & Willetts, M. C. (2002). Social networking sites and alter when you look at the private dating. In A. Vangelisti, H. Reis, & Yards. A great. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Balance and change from inside the Relationship (pp. 257-284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [ Links ]
Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (2002). Preference some things (in a number of individuals) over others: Companion choice in intimate matchmaking and relationships. Log regarding Personal and personal Relationship, 19, 463-481. [ Links ]
Personal Relationships, eight, 325-340
Sprecher, S., Schwartz, P., Harvey, J., & Hatfield, Age. (2008). For the S. Sprecher, A beneficial. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook from relationship initiation (pp. 249-265). Nyc: Therapy Force/Taylor & Francis. [ Backlinks ]
Straaten, I., Engles, Roentgen. C. Yards. E., Finkenauer, C., & Holland, R. W. (2009). Conference their suits: How attractiveness similarity has an effect on strategy decisions in blended-sex dyads. Identification and you may Personal Therapy Bulletin, 35, 685-697. [ Backlinks ]
Sunnafrank, Yards., & Miller, G. R. (1981). New part off first conversations from inside the choosing attraction in order to comparable and unlike complete strangers. People Communication Lookup, 8, 16-25. [ Hyperlinks ]
Sunnafrank, Yards., & Ramirez, A beneficial. (2004). At first: Persistent relational outcomes of rating-familiar with conversations. Journal off Personal and private Dating, 21, 361-379. [ Links ]
Tenny, Age. Roentgen., Turkheimer, Age., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2009). Getting liked is more than with a great identification: The latest part out of complimentary. Log of Search into the Identification, 43, 479-585. [ Website links ]
Vangelisti, An excellent. L., & Perlman, D. (Eds.) (2006). The Cambridge handbook away from individual dating. Cambridge College Drive. [ Links ]
Thebusinessoflove: Matchmaking initiation at the Websites matchmaking features
Walster, Grams.,W., Hatfield, Age., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. (1966). Need for physical appeal within the dating conclusion. Log off Identification and you will Societal Mindset, cuatro, 508-516. [ Links ]
Watson, D., Klohnen, E. C., Casillas, A beneficial., Simms, Elizabeth Letter., Haig, J., & Berry, D. S. (2004). Matches makers and you can offer breakers: Analyses from assortative mating during the newlywed couples. Log off Identification, 72, 1029-1068. [ Links ]
Whisman, Meters. A beneficial., Coastline, S. R. H., & Snyder, D. K. (2008). Was marital dissension taxonic and will taxonic position getting assessed reliably? Comes from a national, user decide to try of married people. Record regarding Consulting and Health-related Mindset, 76, 745-755. [ Hyperlinks ]